Hassan v. City of New York

Home   Hassan v. City of New York

photo of protesters

NYPD Agrees to Landmark Settlement

After almost six years of litigation, including securing a historic appellate court ruling in 2015 rebuking the New York Police Department’s discriminatory surveillance program, the Hassan plaintiffs finally reached a landmark settlement with the NYPD. The settlement makes it clear: simply being Muslim is not a basis for suspicion — or a basis for surveillance. This settlement marks a monumental victory for American Muslim communities who have demanded fair and equal treatment by law enforcement. The Hassan plaintiffs are incredibly courageous Americans who were willing to step forward and stand up for their rights and the rights of all Americans against the largest, most powerful police department in the country.  Like civil rights trailblazers Rosa Parks, Linda Brown, and others before them, the Hassan plaintiffs have fought systemic discrimination — and won.

Read details of the entire settlement here.

Summary

A diverse group of American Muslim plaintiffs filed suit to end the New York Police Department’s invasive and discriminatory spying program. The first legal challenge against the NYPD for intrusive practices targeting American Muslims, the lawsuit seeks an immediate end to the unlawful surveillance and the purging of files maintained by the NYPD.

As documented by the Associated Press, the NYPD has been conducting unlawful surveillance of innocent American Muslims simply because of their faith.  American Muslims were targeted in New York City, as well as in towns, mosques, businesses, and college campuses throughout the northeast, including New Jersey.  Records show that the NYPD took copious notes on the details of American Muslims’ daily lives.

The plaintiffs in the lawsuit are as diverse as the American Muslim community itself: they include a decorated U.S. Army reservist, a small business owner who is also a Vietnam veteran, students and imams.

 

 

On October 13, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a comprehensive and stirring decision in the case Hassan v. City of New York, recognizing that New Jersey Muslims who have been subjected to the New York City Police Department’s program of blanket, suspicionless surveillance stated a valid claim of discrimination on the basis of their religion. The decision reversed a district court ruling dismissing the case.

Amici Curiae Briefs

Amici Signatories

Over 60 organizations and individuals joined amici curiae briefs in support of the Hassan plaintiffs’ position:

  • 100 Blacks in Law Enforcement Who Care
  • American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC)
  • American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey
  • The American Humanist Association
  • Americans United for Separation of Church and State
  • Arab American Association of New York (AAANY)
  • Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund (AALDEF)
  • Asian Americans Advancing Justice — Asian Law Caucus (ALC)
  • The Association of Black Women Lawyers of New Jersey
  • The Auburn Theological Seminary
  • Bend the Arc: A Jewish Partnership for Justice
  • The Bill of Rights Defense Committee
  • Brennan Center for Justice
  • The Central Conference of American Rabbis
  • Chris Burbank (Salt Lake City Chief of Police)
  • The Council of Islamic Organization of Greater Chicago (CIOGC)
  • Creating Law Enforcement Accountability & Responsibility (CLEAR)
  • DRUM — South Asian Organizing Center (formerly Desis Rising Up and Moving)
  • Eric Adams (Brooklyn Borough President)
  • The Garden State Bar Association
  • The Hispanic Bar Association of New Jersey
  • Holly Yasui (Daughter of Minoru Yasui)
  • The Hindu Temple Society of North America
  • Imam Mahdi Association of Marjaeya (IMAM)
  • Interfaith Alliance Foundation
  • The Islamic Shura Council of Southern California
  • The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)
  • Jay Hirabayashi (Son of Gary Hirabayashi)
  • Karen Korematsu (Daughter of Fred Korematsu)
  • Latino Justice PRLDEF
  • Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF)
  • The Muslim Alliance in North America
  • Muslim American Civil Liberties Coalition (MACLC)
  • Muslim Bar Association of New York (MuBANY)
  • Muslim Congress
  • Muslim Consultative Network (MCN)
  • Muslims for Peace
  • Muslim Legal Fund of America (MLFA)
  • Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC)
  • The National Council of Jewish Women
  • The National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA (NCC)
  • National Lawyers Guild — New York City Chapter (NLG-NYC)
  • National Network for Arab American Communities (NNAAC)
  • The National Religious Campaign Against Torture
  • New Jersey Muslim Lawyers Association (NJMLA)
  • North Jersey Media Group Inc.
  • The Northern California Islamic Council
  • Project SALAM (Support and Legal Advocacy for Muslims)
  • The Queens Federation of Churches, Inc.
  • The Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association
  • The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
  • Shia Rights Watch (SRW)
  • The Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund
  • The Sikh Coalition
  • South Asian Americans Leading Together (SAALT)
  • Ta’leef Collective
  • T’ruah: The Rabbinic Call for Human Rights
  • The Union for Reform Judaism
  • The Unitarian Universalist Legislative Ministry of New Jersey
  • The Universal Muslim Association of America (UMAA)
  • Universal Muslim Association of America Advocacy (UMAA Advocacy)
  • The Women of Reform Judaism

Case Documents

document_icon_2-2
Stipulation of Settlement
 – April 5, 2018

document_icon_2-2
Answer Brief of Defendant in U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
 – Jan. 15, 2016

document_icon_2-2
Opinion Ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit – Oct. 13, 2015

document_icon_2-2
Reply Brief of Plaintiff-Appellants in U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
 – Nov. 7, 2014

document_icon_2-2
Brief of Plaintiff-Appellants in U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
 – Jul. 3, 2014

document_icon_2-2


Opinion of Judge William J. Martini
 – Feb. 20, 2014

document_icon_2-2
Defendant’s Memorandum in Further Support of Motion to Dismiss
 – Feb. 25, 2013

document_icon_2-2
Exhibits
 – Jan. 25, 2013

document_icon_2-2
Plaintiffs’ Brief in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss – Jan. 25, 2013

document_icon_2-2
Plaintiffs’ Letter Regarding Melendres v. Arpaio
 – May 30, 2013

document_icon_2-2
Defendant’s Memorandum of Motion to Dismiss
 – Dec. 6, 2012

document_icon_2-2
Declaration of Peter G. Farrell
 – Dec. 6, 2012

document_icon_2-2
Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint
 – Oct. 3, 2012

 

Meet Some of the Plaintiffs

 Moiz Mohammed

Currently in his third year at Rutgers University – New Brunswick, Moiz is focusing his studies in molecular biology and biochemistry and anticipates receiving a Bachelor of Sciences degree in 2014.  Since his faith is important to him, Moiz stays active within the Muslim community at Rutgers by attending weekly Muslim Student Association (MSA) lectures.  Recently, Moiz was elected Fundraising Head for his university’s MSA chapter for the upcoming school year.

 Imam W. Deen Shareef

He is the Convener of the Council of Imams in New Jerseya body of Muslim Leaders from various mosques and centers located in New Jersey who cooperate to develop and implement initiatives to improve the quality of life of the citizens in the communities they reside.  He also is a co-founder of the Newark Interfaith Coalition for Hope and Peace an organization of diverse faith leaders working to reduce violence in the City of Newark.  As a consultant he serves as a director on several boards in addition to conducting lectures, workshops, counseling, educating and training people in organizational and project management, ethics, moral guidance, personal and professional management, social responsibility and how to achieve ethically, intellectually and materially balanced lives.

Imam Wahy-ud Deen Shareef is also the proud father of four children and seven grandchildren.

Other notable achievements:

  • Served as Engineer Project Manager for Kraft/Nabisco Foods for 25 years.
  • President and CEO of Shareef Professional Services LLC, a consulting company assisting groups with the process of project development and management.
  • Co-founded Waris Associates Inc. to address community concerns about education, economy, and culture.

 Specialist Farhaj Hassan, U.S. Army Reserves

Specialist Farhaj Hassan was born in Chicago and grew up in Central New Jersey.  Farhaj resides in New Jersey and focuses on operational security for the Army.  He has done a tour in Iraq as part of the US Army 304th Civil Affairs Brigade, and has earned the Army Service Ribbon, Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Ribbon, National Defense Ribbon, Iraq Campaign Medal, Good Conduct Medal, three Army Commendation Medals, Army Achievement Medal, Combat Action Badge.

Other notable achievements:

  • Conducted medical assessment and provided security in a humanitarian mission to Haiti with Imamia Medics International after the 2010 earthquake.
  • Worked as an EMT for DBO – Pro Care Patient Transport and Ambulatory Services.
  • Member of Iraq Afghanistan Veterans of America, the Civil Affairs Association and the US Green Buildings Coalition.

 Imam Abdul Kareem Muhammad

Abdul Kareem Muhammad is the Resident Imam of Masjid Al-Haqq, and Director of Education of the Clara Muhammad School, Newark, New Jersey.

Imam Muhammad is a member of the Northeast Regional Imams, Council of Imams in New Jersey, and the Northeast Regional Education Committee.  He is the formal Principal, Vice-Principal, Instructor, and Dean of Boys for the Muhammad University of Islam in Newark, New Jersey.

Imam Muhammad is the formal Chaplaincy Supervisor for the Department of Corrections in New Jersey, and is a member of the American and New Jersey Chaplains’ Association, and Convener for the Interfaith Dialogue Committee of Newark, New Jersey.

Imam Muhammad is a graduate of Saint Augustine’s College in Raleigh, North Carolina, where he earned a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Education.  He is married to Kareemah Muhammad, and is the recipient of numerous awards for outstanding Community Service, and performed Hajj in 2004.

 

What People Are Saying About the NYPD Spying Program

Find out what national and local government and community leaders are saying about NYPD’s surveillance program.

Members of Congress

U.S. Representative Rush Holt (D-NJ)
“America is not safer when we spend valuable law enforcement resources on investigating the innocent multitudes rather than identifying the guilty few.  This lawsuit is a thoughtful, sensible step toward bringing law enforcement practices back into line with constitutional protections and the standards of good policing.”

“Casting suspicion on people on the basis of their race, religion, or ethnicity without any legally valid reasons is not the way we behave in America. Profiling in policing is a substitute for thinking.”

U.S. Representative Judy Chu (D-LA), Chair, Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus
“National security must be a priority for this country, but if we destroy those things that make America great in the process, then what are we protecting in the first place?”

U.S. Representative Steve Rothman (D-NJ)
“We live in very dangerous times and protecting our country and all of our families must always be our top priority, but targeting individuals based on their religion is never acceptable and fundamentally un-American.”

Newark City Council Members

Luis A. Quintana
“I’m a Christian but I stand with my Muslim brothers and sisters.  If it’s Muslims who are spied upon just because of their religion, which group will be next?”

Ronald C. Rice
“We should join them (Muslims) in the name of religious freedom, respect, and the Constitution.”

Darrin S. Sharif
“The City Council can and will do something about this situation. You have my solid commitment that we will do whatever is required…we can’t walk into a mosque without worrying about someone standing on top of a building or snapping our picture.” 

New York City Council Members

Jumaane D. Williams
“I have serious questions as to the motivations of the NYPD’s surveillance program, especially with this new information. With each piece of breaking news, the overall picture of civil rights abuse becomes more disturbing.”

Other Pertinent Voices

Scott Stringer – Manhattan Borough President
“Whenever the police get wind of a potential threat, we expect them to pursue the matter with all deliberate speed and keep New York City safe.  But it is troubling when people are subject to surveillance and investigation simply because they are members of a particular group. We need to ensure that our efforts to combat the threat of terrorism does not trample on the civil liberties that all citizens have a right to enjoy.”

Ronald Davis – East Palo Alto Police Chief
“What is equally troubling and unsettling with the idea of using race, national origin or religion in the ‘national security’ context is that it suggests the most powerful nation in the world equipped with law enforcement and national security experts second-to-none must rely on bias and sloppy guess-work to secure the nation, rather than rely on human intelligence, evidence-based strategies, science, technology, and industry expertise. I want to strongly emphasize this point: there is no reason to profile on the basis of race, religion, national origin, or ethnicity, whether it is justified as an effort to protect our communities from terrorism, illegal immigration, or violent crime.”

Robert Jackson – NYC Council Education Committee Chairman
“When you step on one religious group, Muslims, then you’re stepping on every religious group, and if you take the position, ‘Well its not me.  I’m not concerned about it’; it’s not you today, but what if it’s you tomorrow?”

 

Pre-Lawsuit Timeline of NYPD-Related Activities

June 6, 2012
Muslim Advocates files lawsuit against the NYPD for racial and religious profiling of Muslims in New Jersey.

May 2012
Representative Rush Holt, D-N.J., and Representative Keith Ellison, D-MN, introduce a resolution proposing to end NYPD programs that had enabled officers to conduct surveillance in mosques and venues as well.

April 20, 2012
Muslim Advocates respond to White House counterterrorism adviser John Brennan’s endorsement of racial and religious profiling by the NYPD.

March 19, 2012
Muslim Advocates and other civil rights organizations urge U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder to open an investigation of the NYPD.

February 3, 2012
Muslim Advocates files complaint demanding New York General Attorney investigate the NYPD concerning surveillance of American – Muslims

February 2012
Senator Robert Menendez requested the U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder to investigate NYPD surveillance in Newark.

October 2011
At least seven members of the New York Senate requested Attorney General of the State of New York Eric Schneiderman conduct an investigation into NYPD mapping and surveillance of the Muslim community

September 6, 2011
AP report states that the NYPD identified 263 “hot spots” in New York City.

September 2011
Representative Rush Holt, D-N.J., requested the Justice Department investigate into the NYPD surveillance of Muslims.

August 31, 2011
AP report published stating an NYPD Demographics Unit was established to “map ethnic neighborhoods” and communities associated with “ancestries of interest” in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut.

September 2007
NYPD begins surveillance outside of its jurisdiction and in Newark, New Jersey.

February 2007
NYPD mapped and surveyed individual venues of Arab, Bangladeshi, Guyanese, Iranian, Pakistani, and Turkish communities within Nassau County, New York.

November 2006
NYPD began following Muslim Student Association websites, blogs, and forums of universities within New York as well as New Jersey.

August 2006
Investigations within the five western towns of Suffolk County, New York began. NYPD officers placed mosques, cuisines, and meat stores under surveillance, taking note of the ethnicity and faith of the owners as well as people visiting these locations.

May 2006
NYPD attempts to identify potential sources of danger due to US-Iran conflict and suggests focusing “intelligence collections at Shi’a mosques.”

February 2006
NYPD began surveying mosques and Muslim individuals in the New York area to speculate the potential backlash from publicizing a Danish cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad.